Attack of the Phone People

Well, one last note about Kerry-Edwards phonebanking. The MoveOn.org site has dozens of phonebank events listed for tomorrow, Election Day. Hundreds of people are already signed up to attend, so a lot of people in Swing America are going to be hearing from people in (what we assume is) Kerryland. My favorite phone-parties are at the very end of the listings, way below the grand events held in big homes in the hills or downtown law offices that have scores of people coming:

Jesse’s Phone-a-thon (1 person is attending)
Shoreline Court
Richmond, CA
No Pets, Handicap Accessible but small, cluttered apartment. Get those swing state voters out to vote!
This event is handicapped accessible.
Tuesday, November 2, 03:00 PM

Me and the phone (1 person is attending)
Claremont Avenue
Richmond, CA
Just me, calling (very private)
Tuesday, November 2, 07:00 AM

Buddhists Beat Bush (1 person is attending)
Page Street
San Francisco, CA
Probably good to bring a cell and/or a phone card. But hey, if you’re not using a phone, you could at least make tea and give us the news updates! You don’t have to be a buddhist to attend – we just happen to be. We’ll go till at least 3pm, then we’ll see if there’s energy to keep going.

The Phone People

Cimg2542Sunday afternoon in West Berkeley. A beautiful fall day, enjoyed by a squad of hoping-against-hope Democrats armed with cellphones. Their mission: To make sure Democrats in Port St. Lucie, Florida, are revved up about voting. My mantra this year: “We’ll see.” As in, “We’ll see how this all pans out.”

Calling Ohio Voters

I tried another few hours of phone-banking today, this time at a Carpenters’ Union local in downtown Oakland. A little different from yesterday: The voters were called were in Ohio; Cincinnati to be exact. Right away, Also, the operation was a little more professional. Instead of depending on volunteers with their own cellphones and paper lists of registered voters, the heart of today’s operation was a bank of PCs running some call center software that ran you through a series of dialing and contact screens. The big goal was to find Kerry voters who needed help getting to the polls, though the message was “please get out and vote.”

The automation was a little disconcerting at first, because every time you end one call, the software placed a new one automatically. The screen you saw as the phone on the other end rang showed who you were calling, their age, their precinct, and included a record of whether they had been called before. The most important thing to get clued into was the voter’s name — wanted to make sure that if someone answered, I had figured out how to pronounce it or how I would fake it. I couldn’t trust myself to try names s like “Jungkunz” — an actual Ohio voter name — on the fly.

I probably started calling people around 2:30 p.m. Pacific time — so 5:30 and early dinner time for people in Cincinnati. I was encouraged after talking to some Florida voters yesterday, but still a little apprehensive. To me, Cincinnati is Republican territory, and I wasn’t clear whether we were calling registered Democrats or just everyone in a certain group of precincts.

The very first guy I got on the line said he was going to vote but wasn’t sure who he’d be voting for. “Probably Bush,” he offered. “I can’t stand Kerry’s wife.” I’ve heard speculation about whether Theresa Heinz Kerry has made a negative impression, but I was nonplussed. I hadn’t anticipated someone seriously citing her as a reason not to vote for her husband.

“I just don’t like the way she talks to people,” the Cincinnati voter said. “She’s not one of us.”

“Not one of us?”

“Not one of us little people,” he said.

“Well,” I said. I hesitated, because you just know the last thing you want to do, if you believe people are keeping any little corner of their mind open, is to antagonize them. “Well, you know, George Bush isn’t really one of the little people, either. He comes from a pretty wealthy family,” I said.

“Yeah, that’s true. But I think I’d rather have him living next door to me than what’s-her-name,” the Cincinnati voter said.

“Yeah, you’re probably right. If you’re thinking about who’d be better to have come over to a barbecue, Bush would probably be more fun,” I said. I didn’t add what I hope the guy would plug in himself — that this whole thing is more like having a barbecue guest who burns your house down and then tells you he did it for your own safety. But he responded, “Well, that’s right, he’d be better at a barbecue.” I said good night and signed off.

Out of 80 or 100 calls I made today, about half of them wound up with me leaving an answering machine message. I just hoped my encouragements to get out and vote weren’t going to Bush households. Of the ones where a live person answered, a handful of the targeted voters were out or couldn’t come to the phone. About two-thirds of the rest said they’d be voting for Kerry. No one needed a ride. I got one young-sounding guy on the phone who said, “No problem! I’ll be out bright and early ’cause I don’t have to work tomorrow. And I’ve got four friends who have never voted before. I made them all register, and I’m picking them all up and taking them to the polls.” Hearing that, after listening to the man complain about the prospective first lady, I found myself pumping one fist as I thanked the guy for everything he’d done.

Kerry voters generally would, as soon as they heard why I was calling, come right out and say who they were voting for. Some said they’re tired of all the campaign phone calls. “It’s nice to get a real person instead of a recording for once,” one man said. The non-Kerry voters were more circumspect — if I really wanted to know whether they were voting for Kerry, I’d have to ask point blank, at which point I’d be told it was none of my business or that the voter would rather not talk about it, thanks, goodbye. But I got one 74-year-old woman who told me she was going to be working the polls and snapped, “I’m definitely not voting for Kerry.” I said — how California of me — she sounded angry about it. She was. She said she hated the fact Kerry had emphasized his Vietnam record. “I’d like to know what he’s done in the last 20 years, not what he did 35 years ago. You change so much in that time you’re just not the same person. Who gets to talk about what they did 35 years ago to explain themselves? What I want to know is what he will do.” She was worked up, but I did offer that I, the Kerry-Edwards volunteer, had never been particularly happy with Kerry’s reliance on his Vietnam service as one of pillar of his campaign. And I added that I agreed that I was more interested in what was going to happen in the next four years, especially about the mess in Iraq. The poll worker told me she was worried about that, too, “but Kerry isn’t the one to fix it.” She wound up apologizing for “blowing off steam,” told me she had been getting a lot of Democratic phone calls — none from Republicans — and that she was just a little fed up. “I’m hoping and praying we do the right thing,” she said. Me too, I told her.

The guy I spent the most time talking with was named Joe. He told me he was voting, but hadn’t figured out for which candidate yet. I asked him whether he had any questions or anything about the election he wanted to talk about. He said, “I sure wish that they’d take care of people here before they go all over the world helping people.” Joe said he’s 44, with four kids. He’s on Social Security disability because he contracted a chronic lung disease while working as a drywall installer. It took him four years to get his Social Security payments, which he said come to $950 a month — barely enough to cover his $940 a month house payment. He said he felt like Kerry would do better for people like him than Bush has, “but then there’s the abortion thing.” He talked himself through that, saying that even though he’s against abortion, he does see choice as a matter of individual rights and added, “What are you going to do about a 15-year-old who gets raped and is forced to have the baby? That just messes her up for life.”

I didn’t say much, really. Just listened: He said Ohio has lost 250,000 jobs this year and asked who’s doing anything about it? He was angry about jobs going overseas; about Mexicans and Arabs, who he believes can come to the United States and work all they want and not pay taxes. He said he’s concerned about the prospect for younger relatives who have gone to college and gotten advanced degrees. “And you know what they’re doing now? They’re working on car lots.” After 20 minutes, he’d pretty much talked himself around to voting for Kerry. “Yeah, I’m going to do it,” he said. “If the right guy doesn’t win, people are going to start fires. They’re going to start riots.”

Will any of the talk make a difference? I mean, will it get Kerry elected? I really have no idea. Part of me feels that a lot of people who have felt unengaged sense something is terribly wrong with Bush’s presidency and want to do something to change it; that a lot of these people actually are encouraged to act by hearing from other people on the phone. And part of me believes that people have just made up their minds and the whole effort is a wash. I guess we’ll have a better idea tomorrow.

Calling Florida Voters

Kate and I just got back from spending a couple of hours calling registered Democratic voters in Florida; in St. Lucie County, Florida, to be a little more specific. We went down to an office building in West Berkeley were a Kerry-Edwards phone bank had been set up, bringing our own cellphones and chargers. We each got a list of about 50 voters, their precincts, and their phone numbers, along with a script to use. The script was basically, “We need every Democratic voter in Florida to turn out.”

A couple things I didn’t anticipate:
–How positive and engaged people seem to be. I had about eight or ten people tell me they had voted already; all but a couple of the half of the people on the list who answered their phones were interested, were upbeat about voting, and most said they were glad to get the call. I had one person say she was too ill to get out and vote, one who said it just wasn’t a good time to talk, and one person who said she’d gotten repeat calls and was a little tired of it.
–How positive and upbeat I felt: You know, after months and months of taking in the campaign through the media, or getting involved only to the extent of making donations, you get to feel that it’s all an elaborate charade. Going someplace here in Berkeley and calling a bunch of people all the way across the country seemed kind of lame. But talking to people who were actually going to the polls, who were pumped up about voting, who were enthusiastic about the candidate’s chances — hey, it made me feel like calling, or doing a little something to at least try to make a little bit of a difference.

I’ll find someplace to go and volunteer tomorrow, too, I think.

In Other News …

I actually have a new story on Wired News today: “Space Race Focuses on Money.” It’s the problem that has beset the new space companies for years: So far, few in the investment world are wild about the prospect of space tourism or backing companies that are pushing speculative technology (of course, when the speculation involved dumping hundreds of millions into an online grocery story or pet supply store, the venture capitalists and investment bankers were lined up around the block to get a taste).

My President Wears a Helmet

GrimesOK, this is by way of a press release. But it’s still interesting. Some Europeans, apparently including Mathias Rust (read about him here, here, and here), the German teenager and perhaps crazy guy who made headlines back in the late 1980s by flying a Cessna from Hamburg to Moscow’s Red Square, have launched a site called Leader of the Free World for anyone, anywhere to choose a candidate in our election next Tuesday.

Yes, it’s frivolous. But it’s also a little sharper than a simple online poll. Voters are asked to agree or disagree to 10 statements. For instance: “Gross human rights violations are a sufficient justification for a country to bring down a tyranny by military force even when there is no consensus within the international community.” Your answer falls on a continuum from complete agreement to complete disagreement with the proposition; you can also vote neutral. After you’ve done that, your responses are tabulated against a list of 65 candidates who appear on ballots somewhere in the United States.

So here’s what I found interesting: I went through the process, and got my list of candidates. So, Number 65 on my list was George W. Bush. That’s reassuring — I really am voting against him. Kerry was Number 40-something. Nader was Number 5. And my Number 1 candidate, the one with whom these 10 statements show I have the greatest affinity, is Jackson Kirk Grimes, whose party is abbreviated on the ballot as “Fasc.” That turns out to be short for “United Fascist Union.”

Grimes’s background includes a stint in the Army (’68-’72), experience as a stockbroker and as an actor in “Shakespearan off-Broadway productions.” He is or has been a member of the Veterans of Foreign Wars, the Eagles of Lackawanna County, and the Screen Actors Guild. His earliest listed political experience is from 1967, when he served as a storm trooper for the “Facist [sic] Freedom Front.” He wants to legalize drugs, repeal limits on gun ownership, guarantee the right to abortion, do away with affirmative action, and spend a lot more money on the military and education while canceling spending for homeland security. Also, he likes to wear what looks like a Roman centurion’s helmet with the plume turned sideways (see above). A real maverick.

It’s also interesting to me that of all the Democratic candidates, the one who was listed first on my candidates list was Kerry. Everyone else, whether it was closet Republican Joe Lieberman or ultralib Al Sharpton, ranked between Kerry and Bush on the bottom end of the ballot. Of course, I haven’t really looked into how the rankings are derived.

And Now, a Word from God

The New York Times published a special election section today. It’s 10 pages, with two ads. On the back page, there’s what looks like an interesting though endless essay from a number of Korean-American groups. The ad starts by describing Korea’s history since World War II, but it’s really a plea for a peaceful solution to the tensions with North Korea, and, at the very end, criticizes a new law (passed last month, signed by Bush earlier this month) called the North Korean Human Rights Act of 2004. The law is an attempt to tie U.S. humanitarian assistance to North Korea to improvements in human rights there; it also provides money for refugee and humanitarian aid, tries to force China to play ball with the U.N. in dealing with North Korean refugees who show up there, and makes it easier for North Korean refugees and defectors to relocate to the United States. Among other things. Kim Jong-Il doesn’t like the law. Also, South Korea apparently lobbied against it because of concerns that encouraging people to leave the North will flood the South with refugees.

But that’s not the ad I wanted to talk about. On page 3 of the special section, there’s a full page of text titled, “Revelation from God/War or Peace?” The ad features God speaking in the first person to Doris Orme of Bonita Springs, Florida (medium for “God Tells New Things to Doris“). God has some hopeful things to say. For instance, He’s getting ready to take some serious action to make the world a better place:

“Do you think that for one moment that I cannot fulfill My mandate to bring you into perfection and into My Image and Likeness and become One with Me? This is the hour when that will be fulfilled, on the foundation of all those who have given unselfishly to bring this hour which is now here with you. … The hour will come very shortly when you will see My hand move. It will be like a mighty thunder … and will be like a thief in the night, but a good thief, ready to fill your heart with joy!”

Maybe most interesting is that God is not a Bush Supporter, and that God holds a Holy Grudge over the Hanging Chads of 2000, and that God has His Holy Dander up over the war in Iraq. As God told Doris on July 24, 2003:

“I asked you to listen to My words very seriously after Mr. Bush became in a leading position here in America. I hesitate to even say he became President, because in My eyes he has never been the President of the United States. He has been a thief. I told you this before — you have a thief in the White House — Barabbas the murderer, and blood would flow in America and around the world, because of this deed. You know, as well as I know, that the election was not an election that was honest. There were many things that went wrong, deliberately went wrong, because people interfered with the rules, in Florida and caused the election to go the way it went.

“… And I told you again that those who live by the sword shall die by the sword. Those who lived in Baghdad had no where to hide, no where to go. I wonder if, the people who decided that, would like to experience that in this nation of America. I am sure they would not. ”

Well, you get the idea. God also discloses that our founding fathers are discussing the situation with Him in the spirit world, that the Bush administration “is leading America down into the pit,” and that salvation for Bush. Tony Blair, and the rest of us lies only in coming clean about our Iraq lies. It’s unhinged and humorous in a way. But also heartrending. And it goes on and on and on.

What’s On Now

The other morning, we were talking about the election, and our son Tom brought up the testimony of Richard Clarke, the former anti-terrorism czar (why not tsar, by the way?), before the 9/11 Commission. Specifically, he mentioned how Clarke had testified that during the Clinton administration, he had a direct line to the national security advisor (Sandy Berger) and other senior officials; under Bush, he said, his communications were put in a channel through subordinates that often meant it took months for him to get a meeting with the national security chief (Condoleeza Rice) on urgent matters. So, of course I like the fact Tom, who’s a senior in high school and getting more and more engaged with the world, has the specifics of Clare’s testimony at hand. It’s interesting where he got it. The 9/11 Commission hearings are offered free on Apple’s iTunes; Tom downloaded the Clarke testimony because he likes to listen to “spoken-word stuff” when he goes to bed. Interesting. When we were kids, we listened to stuff on records and the radio when we went to bed, too; but not so much “spoken-word stuff,” and not anything like the 9/11 Commission hearings (I guess the equivalent for us would have been a recording of Daniel Ellsberg reading The Pentagon Papers.

(And while I’m talking about iTunes, just let me comment on one of their TV ads. Bono, from U2, is on screen, and he counts off the start of a song in Spanish. “Uno, dos, tres, catorce.” Yeah, that’s “one, two, three, fourteen.” Nice. Listeners have picked up on this and are discussing what it means online. One forum I found includes theories that this is a reference to a character on the old ABC series “Three’s Company”; another is that this refers to passages in the New Testament. )

More Signs?

John Brekke points me to a Hunter S. Thompson “Fear and Loathing” piece in Rolling Stone. Hunter’s fevers reveal Bush is a goner, “hammered into jelly” by Kerry during the debates. The article is a weird tour de force, actually a little reminiscent of the magnificent opening to Don DeLillo’s “Underworld,” set at the 1951 playoff between the Brooklyn Dodgers and the New York Giants, with Bobby Thomson, Ralph Branca, and Russ Hodges brought together at New York’s Polo Grounds with Jackie Gleason, Frank Sinatra, Toots Shor, and J. Edgar Hoover. Hunter knits together his own amazing patchwork of characters and events to put George W. Bush in perspective: Karl Rove and Hitler and the Reichstag fire, Bedouins, Julius Caesar, Nixon, Muhammad Ali, Bill Clinton, Iraq, and the dark spirit of the Bush family’s adopted hometown: “Houston is a cruel and crazy town on a filthy river in East Texas with no zoning laws and a culture of sex, money and violence. It’s a shabby sprawling metropolis ruled by brazen women, crooked cops and super-rich pansexual cowboys who live by the code of the West — which can mean just about anything you need it to mean, in a pinch.” Wow. “Super-rich pansexual cowboys.” It’s a nice, nasty piece of fantasy. What astounds is that Hunter can still string so many sentences together.

Rolling Stone’s got another item that may be of more import in how the country is looking at Bush and Kerry. Eminem, whom I’m guessing has a bigger following than Hunter Thompson among today’s youth, has some angry words for the commander-in-chief: ” “I think he started a mess . . . He jumped the gun, and he fucked up so bad he doesn’t know what to do right now . . . We got young people over there dyin’, kids in their teens, early twenties that should have futures ahead of them. And for what? It seems like a Vietnam 2. Bin Laden attacked us, and we attacked Saddam. Explain why that is. Give us some answers.” Obviously, Eminem — who says that at age 36 he’s registered to vote for the first time — wasn’t satisfied with the explanations Bush offered during the debates.

Pissing off Andrew Sullivan is one thing. Pissing off Eminem is another. That could make even Jenna and Barbara Jr. jump ship.

11 Days …

… (or is it 10?) until the election. How will it go? I haven’t the faintest idea, though I made an impulsive bet during a brief fit of optimism yesterday that Kerry will win. It’s interesting, in any case, to watch the projected electoral vote total sway first one way, then the other; if you look at that, the race looks like it’s balanced on a knife’s edge; a repeat of 2000. And maybe it is, and will be.

But more interesting to me is a brief foray into a conservative blog I’ve long avoided: Andrew Sullivan’s. I’m not proud of having avoided it; but I’ve felt I could do without the aggravation of watching someone clever manufacture clever arguments to explain how what Bush is doing to the United States — the war, the erosion of civil liberties in the name of the state, the fear mongering, the naked embrace of fundamentalist Christianity as a guiding principle for government — is good for us. But today, I hit a link to Sullivan’s site, and was surprised to see that he — and some other thinking conservatives — have turned on Bush because of the Iraq disaster.

Here’s one representative post from Sullivan, in which he first quotes a Thomas Friedman (New York Times) column at length, then adds a brief mea culpa of his own:

“Conservatives profess to care deeply about the outcome in Iraq, but they sat silently for the last year as the situation there steadily deteriorated. Then they participated in a shameful effort to refocus the country’s attention on what John Kerry did on the rivers of Vietnam 30 years ago, not on what George Bush and his team are doing on the rivers of Babylon today, where some 140,000 American lives are on the line. Is this what it means to be a conservative today?

Had conservatives spoken up loudly a year ago and said what both of Mr. Bush’s senior Iraq envoys, Jay Garner and Paul Bremer, have now said (and what many of us who believed in the importance of Iraq were saying) – that we never had enough troops to control Iraq’s borders, keep the terrorists out, prevent looting and establish authority – the president might have changed course. Instead, they served as a Greek chorus, applauding Mr. Bush’s missteps and mocking anyone who challenged them.

Conservatives have failed their own test of patriotism. In the end, it has been more important for them to defeat liberals than to get Iraq right. Had Democrats been running this war with the incompetence of Donald Rumsfeld & Friends, conservatives would have demanded their heads a year ago – and gotten them.” – Tom Friedman, telling it like it is. I’m guilty as well. I was so intent on winning this war and so keen to see the administration succeed against our enemy that I gave them too many benefits of the doubt. Well, I have tried to reassess. I may be proven wrong. I hope I am. But ignoring reality in a situation as vital as this is not an option.

An important intellectual support for Bush and company looks like it’s collapsing. I wonder what effect it will have in the vote.