Not to wear out the subject, but the San Francisco Examiner — the
former Monarch of the Dailies — yesterday published a somewhat different take on the Paul Dean shooting. The biggest difference: The story explicitly raises the question of whether the shooting was justified. Also important: It names the officer involved in the incident and gives some background on him. I think the Chron must have had that information; I’ve never understood why it would be withheld.
"You want it to be one way. But it's the other way."